This came to my attention as the film of interest for being the film used by Peter Tscherkassky to make his Outer Space (1999), but otherwise dismissed as forgettable big-budget early 80s nonsense. But in his recent book Mysteries of Cinema, Adrian Martin makes a case for Furie's film, and he's quite right. It's a very efficiently done, entertaining - but in places genuinely distressing - horror about supernatural sexual assault, Barbara Hershey is very effective as the protagonist Carla, and there's a nice dose of De Palma-style split diopter shots to keep things off-balance in a very period way. The fact that - for the audience - there's never for a moment a doubt that supernatural forces are involved is refreshing, and helps contribute to the fact that the film is also, for a fair amount of its length, an allegory about women's stories of assault not being believed. (A scene of white-coated doctors shrouded in various types of cigar and pipe smoke discussing Carla's case is a particularly clear instance of this.) The fact that the film is resolutely a genre thriller makes the allegory all the more effective, because it never becomes "the point". And also - how closely must the makers of Ghostbusters watched this film? It's full of little points of connection (similar casting [Hershey is rather Sigourney Weaver-like]; bits of dialogue, other business [the device the parapsychologists carry when they first visit the house])... Any film with a connection to Ghostbusters is off to a good start, in my book. |
No comments:
Post a Comment