My previous experience
of Mauvais Sang was that,
though I found every other film of Carax's to be at the very least
extremely interesting, this film was one of the most deeply
irritiating I have ever seen! I don't find it so any more, though it
certainly hasn't become one of my favourites. (It should be said that
the transfer on the Artificial Eye DVD looks stunning, greatly
superior to the DVD of Les Amants du Pont-Neuf that
I have.) What is most striking, watching these two films in close
proximity, are the parallels between them; they almost seem like two
versions of the same thing. In both, Denis Lavant and Juliette
Binoche are at the heart of a narrative of love, death and jealousy,
where physical conditions (the diminishment of capacity or its
overloading) serve highly metaphorical – even allegorical –
functions. Both tales set individuals against sweeping backdrops that
are mostly only alluded to (the passing of Halley's Comet in Mauvais
Sang; the bicenenary of 1789 in
Les Amants). The
progress of these concrete abstractions takes precedence over
conventional narrative per se. In the later film, however, there are
coherently constructed narrative threads throughout, even when they
stretch plausibility to the extent that the film becomes
impressionist, such as when Michelle's poster appears on every
surface Alex passes. The film is satisfying on multiple levels:
narrative, metaphorical, structural. In Mauvais Sang,
however, the opening structure of noirish thriller is handled almost
entirely abstractly. It is abandoned so completely for much of the
film – there is so little sense of tension – that it is a
surprise whenever it returns. This probably accounts for my initial
irritation; not expecting the film to be any kind of crime drama
helps on accomodate oneself to it. (Both films have a kind of prelude
after which Lavant and Binoche enter into their "world"
together, largely – but not entirely – cut off from surrounding
realities. But in Mauvais Sang
this prelude promises a genre that the film entirely unfulfils, while
in Les Amants it deals
with the world of the down-and-outs in Paris and their treatment by
the authorities and so, though we never quite return there – Alex's
arrest at the end draws him into the more standard world of the
police – it sets up a number of narrative and thematic issues very
effectively.) Mauvais Sang may
have the more arresting set-pieces (such as Alex's run along the
street to the soundtrack of Bowie, and his magic tricks; some of the
set-pieces in the later film seem like less effective re-runs of
these), but Les Amants
seems to me the more consistently engaging work of the two, in no
small part because of Binoche, who is quite remarkable. Despite the
various extremities she has to go to she avoids caricature entirely.
Her mannerisms only return at the end of the film, as it sets itself
up for the happy ending that its logic does not really lead towards.
(I believe Carax's initial intention was to have a tragic ending.) If
one wanted to distill a notion of the "Caraxian", these two
films would be excellent tools with which to do so; but if I were to
be forced to never see two of his films again, I think these two
would very likely be the ones I would choose.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment