This is the only one of
Carax's films which is a literary adaptation, but on the strength of
it I'd love to see him do more. Much has been made of its obscurities
and obliquities, but Melvile's Pierre
is a very strange book in the first place, and Carax's film is in
fact a rather straight adaptation, with, of course, certain
adjustments. Aside from the change of time and location, there is the
introduction in the middle of political content concerning the
treatment of Roma people (which manages not to either overwhelm or be
overwhelmed by the film's other concerns), and of course the fact
that, unlike in the book, not all the protagonists finish up dead.
Ultimately the film, much like the book, is a Gothic melodrama, and
it would be interesting to consider it in the wider context of
cinematic melodramas. Of course there are connections to Carax's
previous films (Pierre develops both Alex's limp and Michelle's
fading eyesight from Les Amants du Pont-Neuf)
but for the most part a certain naturalism takes hold (modulated, of
course, by the extremity of the content). The performances are almost
surprisingly restrained; it is as an ensemble that the film
impresses. The opposition between the ludicrously glowing opening,
almost a Merchant Ivory pastiche, all golden hair and blazingly white
clothes, and the literal darkness later on (either rich midnight
blues or, as in Isabelle's remarkable opening monologue, almost
completely black – the comparisons here with Grandrieux's Sombre
don't seem off the mark) is very well handled; the point being that
neither extreme represents either health or sickness, whether of body
or mind. Like many a self-respecting melodrama, families,
quasi-families and pseudo-families are at the heart of the narrative,
and in particular their secrets. We are asked to wonder whether
certain secrets need to be exposed, lancing the boil, but also if
some secrets are best off remaining secret. Eventually, the film
deeply problematises the distinction between the apparent and the
concealed; lies and secrets might even be said to create
the very distinction, so that – as with the empty room behind the
blocked-up door in the chateau – there may be nothing behind them,
or the attempt to reveal the truth may only plunge one further into
doubt, as when Pierre attempts to shed his pseudonym but is accused
of being an impostor. Pierre tries to write a novel that will reveal,
as he says, the great lie hiding behind everything, only to be
accused once again, this time of plagiarism by his publisher.
Authenticity proves not to consist in penetrating beyond the surface.
There may be no such
lie – which by no means guarantees that all is truth. Isabell's
claim to be his sister cannot be neatly deciphered as either truth,
lie or delusion. Pola X
seems to conclude with the profoundly unconsoling message that we
cannot operate other than by lies and concealments, but that they
will nonetheless come to destroy us, in the end.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment